Beyond GPUs - Part 1 Why Multi-Cloud, Multi-Compute Matters for AI Founders

Post date

September 30, 2025

Post author

Jean-Baptiste Louazel

AI infrastructure is evolving quickly, and it has become clear that no single type of hardware can meet the needs of every workload. From training massive models to running low-latency inference at scale, founders and developers are running headfirst into the realities of heterogeneous compute.

The future of AI infrastructure isn't GPU-first—it's workload-first. Here's why that matters for your company.

The Infrastructure Reality AI Founders Face Today

AI-native companies don't have the luxury of waiting for perfect infrastructure. You're building products while the hardware landscape shifts under your feet.

NVIDIA GPUs and CUDA have been the default for years, but as workloads spread across cloud, edge, and on-premise environments, it's becoming clear: no single vendor or accelerator will cover every need.

That's what multi-cloud, multi-compute really means. It's the reality of training and running models across GPUs, TPUs, CPUs, and emerging silicon—not by choice, but by necessity.

Why This Matters for Your AI-Native Startup

If you're starting or scaling an AI company, multi-cloud, multi-compute isn't some distant technical abstraction. It has very real business consequences.

Time-to-Market When Capacity Is Constrained

Time-to-market is a key area where dependence on a single vendor shows its strain. When your workloads are locked to one ecosystem, you inherit that vendor's bottlenecks and roadmap. If they can't deliver capacity, you can't deliver product.

Operational Flexibility as Requirements Change

The hardware best suited for large-scale training isn't always the most efficient choice for production inference. Training benefits from maximum throughput and memory bandwidth, while inference often demands low latency and cost efficiency. Without the ability to choose the right accelerator for the right job, teams are forced into compromises that slow progress and increase costs.

Developers Feel the Pain First

Your developers see the cracks every day:

  • Tooling and libraries that quietly assume CUDA-only environments
  • Kernels that behave differently (or fail) on non-NVIDIA accelerators
  • Silent performance regressions that only surface under production load

Switching between hardware backends is rarely plug-and-play. It's often days of debugging drivers, runtimes, and container images.

The runtime never behaves exactly the same. Kernels that compile fine on CUDA may fail silently on ROCm. Even small version mismatches (CUDA, cuDNN, NCCL) can cause hours of debugging or subtle performance drops.

The Shift Is Already Happening

This isn't theoretical. The ecosystem is moving toward diversity whether teams are ready or not:

  • Frameworks like vLLM support AMD, TPUs, and AWS Trainium out of the box
  • Compiler projects like OpenXLA and TVM are building real portability
  • Inference workloads are spreading to CPUs, edge devices, and custom silicon to balance latency, cost, and energy use

Several projects are moving in the right direction, but none offer complete solutions yet:

  • OpenXLA & TVM:  Promising compiler frameworks, but they require significant engineering effort
  • Triton:  Lowers the barrier for custom GPU kernels, though still mostly NVIDIA-centric
  • Quantization & batching strategies: Useful optimizations, but add another layer of configuration to manage

Developers are left stitching these pieces together, often without clear guidance.

Making Multi-Cloud, Multi-Compute Manageable

The challenge isn't whether multi-cloud, multi-compute is "good" or "bad." It's how much engineering effort it takes to make it usable. Most founders would rather spend that time shipping features, not troubleshooting driver mismatches.

The ecosystem is pushing toward diversity faster than most teams can adapt. The hardware ecosystem is diversifying faster than the software ecosystem can keep up. Developers who try to manage it all themselves will spend more time debugging than building.

The challenge isn't heterogeneity. The challenge is making it manageable.

This is why a workload-first approach matters—abstracting runtimes, managing scheduling, and making mixed hardware clusters behave predictably.

What's needed is a platform that can run any AI workload on any cloud, any compute, anywhere, period.

The goal isn't to replace developer control but to reduce the time lost to infrastructure friction.

What Forward-Thinking Founders Are Doing

Many founders are planning for this reality early to avoid expensive rewrites later. They're:

  • Building with portability in mind from day one
  • Choosing tools and frameworks that support multiple backends
  • Partnering with infrastructure providers who can abstract the complexity
  • Focusing engineering time on product differentiation, not infrastructure plumbing

The future belongs to founders who can move fast across any hardware stack—not just the one that's available today.


Look for Part 2: "Multi-Cloud, Multi-Compute in Practice: What Developers Actually Face" where we'll dive into the technical realities and how FlexAI's approach makes heterogeneous compute manageable.

FlexAI Logo

Get Started Today

To celebrate this launch we’re offering €100 starter credits for first-time users!

Get Started Now